The
Robot Who Didn’t Believe In Santa Claus
_________________________________________
There was this one robot once who didn’t believe in
Santa Claus, about which you might say Big
whoop I bet a lot of robots don’t believe in Santa Claus, or, if you are
smarter even you might say I bet a lot of
robots don’t believe, period because you would be thinking that robots,
being cold bundles of electricity and chrome and diodes and sometimes spare
parts, aren’t programmed to believe
and that circuit boards can’t engage in the kind of faith-based speculation
that belief entails.
But robots can believe
things. It’s just that this particular robot did not happen to believe in this
particular thing, Santa Claus.
It didn’t have any real reason for not believing in Santa Claus, but if
this was pointed out to it the robot would say, in a metallic voice that still
sounded a little condescending despite having zero inflection:
If there was a reason to not believe in something, then that
would imply that there were reasons to believe
in something.
if there is a reason to believe in a thing, that reason might be proven False,
if there is a reason to believe in a thing, that reason might be proven False,
the robot would then argue, using
its logic circuits like a cudgel:
Anything that can be proven False might be also proven True, and anything
that can be proven to be True might possibly exist, and if it might possibly
exist then one should believe in it – because why would a logical being such as
say a robot who doesn’t believe in Santa Claus
(it would add parenthetically)
deny the possible existence of
something that is possible? If something is possible it is illogical not to
believe that it might exist, so the only reason to not believe in something is
if one has no reason for not believing in that thing.
By the time it finished that line of argument, which
went on for much longer than I have laid down here, most people had tired of
the robot and walked away.
No comments:
Post a Comment