In the newly-renamed 513 Dates, which last appeared here, I will describe a date I'd like to take Sweetie on, and why.
2. The House On The Rock.
Sweetie swears we have been to "The House On The Rock," and Sweetie doesn't lie, which means one of several things:
1. Sweetie is lying, or
2. Sweetie went to The House On The Rock in another life. Probably when she was a pilgrim. I bet Sweetie was a pilgrim in a past life. But a famous one. Everyone was famous in their past life. Or at least it seems so.
(I once wrote a song called Everbody's Famous In Their Past Life, but that was a long time ago and I can't find where I wrote it down. What I recall is that the chorus was the title, and also it had the line "Too few indians and too many chiefs." It probably also relied heavily on the G chord, which I liked.)
Here is what I know about "The House On The Rock": It is located not far from us, about a couple of miles, and it apparently has a whale in it (but not a live one) and a calliope or maybe a Merry-Go-Round (but not a live one) and, of course, Sweetie has been there.
I drive by The House On The Rock, or at least signs that promise to take me to it if I follow them, probably once a month or so, on business, and I always think "We should go there." So I added it to the list of things that I think we should go to and/or do, a list I call "Saturdays" because let's face it, at this point I'm not even pretending that I'm going to do chores anymore, and I mentioned to Sweetie that we ought to go there, which was when Sweetie mentioned that we had gone there.
I think that Sweetie is actually getting confused by one of two places we actually have gone, one of which was a date and one of which was not, although it would be hard to confuse either of these places with a House that may or may not contain a whale and a Merry Go Round.
The first place is the "Cave Of The Mounds," which is located, in geographic terms, not very far from the House On The Rock. It may be that the House -- which was actually built by Frank Lloyd Wright and is apparently architecturally important beyond its whale-carrying capacity and which is enough of a tourist attraction to have featured into Neil Gaiman's book American Gods as (if I recall correctly) some sort of place of power where Odin might have killed someone?
The more I think about it, the more uncertain I am about The House On The Rock, including whether or not it sits on an actual rock and/or how it got that name.
We went to the Cave of the Mounds, which is a local cave, one day back when I was in law school or had just graduated from law school and so was in the phase of my life where I didn't have much money, and at that time I was also in the phase of my life where I was insisting that if my family, who I spoke to back then, wanted to hang out with me they should sometimes make the trip up to Madison, where I lived, from Milwaukee, where they lived.
I had, back then, the same two brothers and a sister that I have now, and my Mom was still alive, and all my nephews and nieces were much younger, and whenever we wanted to get together to do something (which I wanted only rarely at best) they would tell me to drive to Milwaukee.
"It's easier," they'd say, but for who? Not for me.
Once, my younger brother said that it was tougher for all of them to pile into their cars and drive up to us, but I pointed out that individually that was pretty much not true, and that while there were more people coming here than going there, if they came to visit, each person still had more or less the same burden.
So one weekend I put my foot down and they came here and Sweetie and the kids and I and the rest of my side of the family joined together for a trip to the Cave Of The Mounds, a local cave that had been uncovered and set up for touring not far from here, and that trip -- probably 13 or 14 years ago now -- is lost to my memory, too, except for a few things that stick out.
The first thing that sticks out was that the temperature dropped, literally, about 20 degrees while we waited for my family to arrive. We were out in the parking lot of my apartment, and they were supposed to be there, but they weren't, and while we waited, some sort of cold front moved in and for the only time in my life I could feel the weather changing, as the temperature went from 75 to 55 in just twenty minutes or so.
When I tell people about that, people give me a sort of disbelieving look, as if to say "You're making that up," but why would I make that up? It's not actually that astonishing, really. It was weird but not superstrange, as the temperature drops all the time in summer, especially in Wisconsin, and it's not unusual to have a 55 degree day in Wisconsin in June because this state sucks and I wish I lived in Hawaii or at least southern California.
The other thing I remember about that day is that they had a little nook in the cave where they had put Smurfs, which was supposed to be charming -- the guide said something about how they'd broken into this room and "Look what they discovered!" but I didn't like it, because Smurfs don't live underground, and more importantly, I don't think natural wonders of the world need additional cutesy stuff crammed into them. There's not a giant Nemo swimming over Niagara Falls every twenty minutes, or a huge inflatable singing cactus floating over the Grand Canyon.
Don't get me wrong: I love touristy things. The more touristy, the better. One of the holes in my life, a spot where I am profoundly sad in my soul and always will be, exists because I have never, not ever, stopped at a "Mystery Spot" in a tourist town, the spot where gravity is fouled up and tourists are suckered. I've seen them, on vacations and here in the Wisconsin Dells which I drive through as often as I can because if there is something more fun than a street filled with go-karts, upside-down-houses, taffy stores, and the like, I don't know what it is.
And I don't mind that tourist traps are built around natural wonders, like all those water parks that surround the Wisconsin Dells, because once you're done looking at rock formations or a waterfall, it's kind of fun to go to a Planet Hollywood and buy some junk or have a hamburger named after Arnold Schwarzenegger. (If such a thing exists. I imagine it would have egg on it.)
(The "Schwarz" would be the burger.)
But to jam the tourist junk into the natural wonder is like advertising on the moon: it seems like a great idea until you get tired of seeing The Real Housewives staring back at you every night for 30 days and begin to pray that the moon crashes into the Earth.
The other thing that I think Sweetie might be confusing with The House On The Rock is The Rock On The House, a briefly-existing awesome tourist trap, of sorts, that we went to once, also back when we were poor.
The Rock On The House was, for a change, exactly what it sounds like. No whales or gravity inversions or Smurfs, here. It was, quite simply, a house that had a rock fall on it.
But not just ANY rock, mind you: it was a huge rock. The house had been built below a bluff way up in Northern Wisconsin, which I think is inside the arctic circle. The bluff, as I recall, was the kind of bluff that normal people look at and say something like
"No way in heck am I building a house there because what if a rock falls on top of it?"
To which someone else says "What are the odds of a rock falling on it?"
To which people like me say "A whole lot higher than if you did not build it right under that bluff."
And of course a rock fell on the house, a giant rock, maybe 10 or 15 feet tall and about 5 feet wide, which maybe doesn't sound that big to you but trust me: sitting inside the wreckage of a suddenly-small-seeming house, that rock is plenty big.
I like to think -- or rather I try desperately not to think but end up thinking anyway -- about things like a giant rock falling on your house, or the guy who was sitting in his living room and suddenly a truck tire from a freeway a mile away crashed through his living room, or the woman who was watching TV one night and an airplane crashed into her house, all true stories that demonstrate why you're a fool to spend your Saturdays cleaning the garage. Spend four hours out there sorting out that tub of used washers and deciding that you'd better not throw away those old extension cords because they "may be good for something" and then that night a plane carrying a rock gets hit by a truck tire and smashes into your house and then where are you?
Sweetie and I were poor back then, not just poor-er but poor, really, so little money that we usually took a calculator to the grocery store to make sure we didn't go over our budget, and we were hanging around the house one day, not much to do (because we were poor) and I read about The Rock On The House, which had made the local newspaper because the owner of the house had turned lemons into a poorly-run tourist trap and was charging people a buck to come walk through his now-ruined house.
"Let's go," I said, and Sweetie, possibly because she knows sometimes there's no arguing with me and possibly because she thought I'd said "The House On The Rock" agreed.
We hopped into our car, the little dented Hyundai Elantra that was maroon and which we'd later sell to Oldest Daughter, and drove about three hours, at least, north, up to the part of Wisconsin where there are bluffs and large rivers and coal barges, or at least some kind of barges, and long bridges made of rusty-looking metal and small houses and towns that seem to consist of a village hall, fourteen bars, and an antique store that is only open Thursday afternoons. It was the kind of town that it's hard to remember exists, let along remember that it exists all over the place, not just in this part of Wisconsin at that time of February.
When we got there, the Rock On The House was... closed.
So to speak.
Nobody was there, and there was no sign that anyone would be there. This was pre-Internet, so we'd gone and driven up north using nothing more than a newspaper and a paper map, and we were sort of bummed out until I said
"Why don't we just go look inside anyway?"
"Can we?" asked Sweetie.
"I don't see why not?" I said. So we walked up to the house and then around to the side. It was not hard to see where the rock was or how to get in: that rock had smashed open nearly one-half the house, and it was weirdly thrilling to see this giant rock just sitting in the living room and kitchen of a house that had been crushed like a milk carton under a kid's foot.
There was a place to leave a dollar next to the sign that said the Rock on the House was closed, and the dollars were meant to let you buy a "souvenir," the souvenir being little rocks sitting there.
You could walk through this entire house, now empty of almost everything except cabinets and some crushed furniture, and imagine being in that house when the rock smashed down -- or, as the owner had, coming home to see what had happened, in which case you could imagine how lucky you were to have not been there when the rock smashed down.
We stayed about 10 minutes, walking around, touching the rock, not saying much.
Then we got into the car, stopped at a local convenience store and splurged on some snacks -- for the three-hour drive home.
That was around Valentine's Day, probably 15 or so years ago. I don't remember much of anything we talked about that day, but I do remember going, and that's the point of doing things like that: to fix a bit of history in your mind, to remember not just days and days and days with the person you love, but to remember specific bits of days. If I couldn't remember The Rock On The House, I wouldn't remember deciding to splurge on some snacks, or the pleasant six-hour round trip in a warm car with my wife, or the thrilling feeling of trespassing-but-not as we walked through a house smashed into ruin.
So I'd like to take Sweetie to other Rock-and-House-based entertainment, if only to make sure that she and I are both remembering the great times together.
Monday, February 11, 2013
Saturday, February 02, 2013
Monday, January 28, 2013
Updates on ME. (Thinking The Lions)
If you are following the news this morning, and you probably aren't, but if you are, then you know that the news is all about me, provided that in following the news you also follow me and keep detailed track of what I think and do and say and feel, which, if you're not, why am I even bothering with this blog? I'm trying here, people. I'm trying. The least you could do is put forth some effort.
And frankly, I'm trying not to be outraged, because there is a scam being perpetrated, and it's one I could and will blow wide open. In a second. But first, this word from People Who Hate Brominated Vegetable Oil.
Brominated Vegetable Oil is vegetable oil that has had bromine atoms bonded to it, like they all went to camp as kids or something. It's considered "safe" by the FDA except that it's not, unless by safe you mean
An unusual case except that it happened again in the very next sentence:
I mean, okay, headache, ptosis of the right eyelid, small price to pay for drinking Squirt soda, right?
So anyway, all over the news today is that some guy somewhere got some 200,000 signatures on a petition to get Pepsi to remove BVO from Gatorade, which means now professional athletes will only have 2,000,000 other chemicals in their system and that's not even counting Ryan Braun's magic urine (WARNING: DO NOT REFRIGERATE) but here is where I come into the picture:
I started all this.
SERIOUSLY PEOPLE LISTEN TO ME. I started this. Me.
This petition, of which there are many but the main one seems to be from "a Mississippi teenager" (true fact: I can spell Mississippi backwards by memory ippississiM) is getting all sorts of hype now, but where was the media when I tweeted this all the way back on August 28, 2012:
BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE IN THE WORLD... except it's too late because I already am that change.
You can thank me with 10s and 20s, sent to my home, and I will accept them with all the grace of a man burning with the intensity of SN2012aw, which we all know is the newest-discovered supernova and one that is getting brighter, not dimmer, which is how mad I am at this obvious hoax that made it onto legitimate news sites (HuffPo is that now, right?)
Longtime reader(s?) of this blog will instantly realize why I am so mad and so sure that this is a hoax, but for you new reader(s?) let me bring you up to speed, by recalling the halcyon days of yore when I let a Twinkie sit out for 100 days and then ate it:
EVERY STEP of Twinkie Watch was documented by SCIENCE and then I ate it, so I proved then that Twinkies cannot spoil.
But now along comes some Internet Huckster, trying to sell a molded Twinkie (he claims this
is a real picture of it) and frankly SCIENCE will not stand for this, and as the living embodiment of SCIENCE, it is up to me to debunk this horrible person's attempt to grab fame by disproving a law of nature.
I will begin by using Dan Savage's rules for detecting fake letters on his advice column, and I will (SPOILER ALERT! PUN INTENDED!) end by announcing a new SCIENCE!
First, the obviously fake explanation. This is verbatim from Fraudster's Ebay sales site:
Here, Fraudster, who got the attention he wanted, notes that he has a junk food problem, then really loads it on when he tells how he discovered this:
This was a year ago? Interesting. And hard to prove you wrong since you can always say "I don't remember the exact details." Why'd you wait a year to bring this up? A whole year to put it on eBay? YOU ARE A PATIENT MAN.
Wait, what? Did your wife -- who is soooo controlling that you only get Twinkies when she allows it-- also approve the popcorn? Or was that for her?
Remember the lights were dimmed in the room. That's important, as is the fact that this is the second one.
BAM! It was a surprise! he was as surprised as you are! IF ONLY HE HAD OPENED THE PACKAGE IN THE LIGHT, but that would have been anticlimactic: "So I bought some Twinkies and one was rotten," his story would have been. NOT A GRABBER. He needs your attention: "I NEARLY ATE A TWINKIE OF DEATH!"
As for his eyes, they must have been playing a trick on you, but WHAT A TRICK! because in low light, only the rods of your eyes are active and while they are hypersensitive to light, they only see in black and white, so you did NOT see green or yellow.
Also, the corner of your eye would not be looking at a Twinkie directly in front of your face. And if it was, it's even less likely you'd see color because we only see black and white out of peripheral vision, as our brain blocks colors from the side.
It is strongly implied that Fraudster felt sick then -- so maybe he ATE a bad Twinkie? But he didn't notice anything wrong until he saw (?) the green -- so what are we to assume? That the Twinkie was so rotten it could activate his Spider-Sense... only after he saw it? SO: "I NEARLY ATE A TWINKIE OF DEATH AND MIGHT HAVE ACTUALLY EATEN ONE TOO WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING IT BECAUSE IT TOOK SO LONG FOR MY EYES TO ADJUST TO THE LIGHT AND MOLDY TWINKIES TASTE EXACTLY LIKE REAL TWINKIES OH IF ONLY I HAD OPENED THE BOX IN THE LIGHT WHILE POPPIN' THE CORN! WHY MUST I HAVE SUCH A JUNK FOOD PROBLEM?"
Here's something else: He ate them "until [he] got sick." Sick with what? Twinkie disease? Diabetes? Chronic fabricationitis? If he got so sick eating them, why'd Controlling Wife break down and get him some? Was she planning on cashing in his life insurance? Or do you mean that in the past you would just eat them until you got so full of them you'd barf, in which case, it was okay with your wife on this occasion that you take the entire box into the room to watch the movie? "Here you go, honey, and if you have to barf at least do not interrupt the part where Ryan Gosling takes his shirt off."
Ahem.
Second on Dan Savage's tips are needlessly elaborate stories: he wrote to Hostess, got a letter back, got a coupon for some free Twinkies (no photos of any of this, of course), the possibility of the Hostess strike being involved, the overly-broad warnings not to eat the spoiled food.
Finally, Dan Savage's third factor is the attention-seeking nature of the letter-writer. Note THOSE details: The guy has a problem with junk food, and a controlling wife! But he got attention from a massive corporation, and not only that, he has the only original spoiled Twinkie!
The bid on the Twinkie went from 0 to $46 between when HuffPo wrote that story and when I looked at the site, and it appears that Fraudster has sold other items on the site and could no doubt use the attention.
In short, this is a scam. This Twinkie did not spoil. It did not arrive in the package green from mold. Not a single thing that Fraudster wrote in support of this sale is true. Unless maybe he's married. That might be true.
Well, I'm not taking this. I'm not putting up with some stupid scam artist getting publicity trying to claim a fake spoiled Twinkie is real. I am PUTTING MY FOOT DOWN, and GETTING A NEW TWINKIE.
THAT'S RIGHT. SCIENCE is back, and this time, it's serious. Or personal. Or whatever. I have directed Sweetie to get me a Twinkie today. And beginning tomorrow, that Twinkie is going to be exposed to the world forever, to see if it ever ever rots.
You don't mess with me, man. I'll take you down like yesterday's news. Or whatever.
And frankly, I'm trying not to be outraged, because there is a scam being perpetrated, and it's one I could and will blow wide open. In a second. But first, this word from People Who Hate Brominated Vegetable Oil.
Brominated Vegetable Oil is vegetable oil that has had bromine atoms bonded to it, like they all went to camp as kids or something. It's considered "safe" by the FDA except that it's not, unless by safe you mean
In one case, a man who drank eight liters of Ruby-Red Squirt daily had a reaction that caused his skin color to turn red and produced lesions diagnosed as bromoderma. The excessive quantities together with the fact that the man had a higher than normal sensitivity to bromine made this an unusual case.
An unusual case except that it happened again in the very next sentence:
A similar case reported that a man who consumed two to four liters of a cola containing BVO on a daily basis experienced memory loss, tremors, fatigue, loss of muscle coordination, headache, and ptosis of the right eyelid, as well as elevated serum chloride.
I mean, okay, headache, ptosis of the right eyelid, small price to pay for drinking Squirt soda, right?
In the two months it took to correctly diagnose the problem, the patient also lost the ability to walk.*spits soda out, scrubs mouth vigorously with steel wool, goes right on eating "Hot Pocket."*
So anyway, all over the news today is that some guy somewhere got some 200,000 signatures on a petition to get Pepsi to remove BVO from Gatorade, which means now professional athletes will only have 2,000,000 other chemicals in their system and that's not even counting Ryan Braun's magic urine (WARNING: DO NOT REFRIGERATE) but here is where I come into the picture:
I started all this.
SERIOUSLY PEOPLE LISTEN TO ME. I started this. Me.
This petition, of which there are many but the main one seems to be from "a Mississippi teenager" (true fact: I can spell Mississippi backwards by memory ippississiM) is getting all sorts of hype now, but where was the media when I tweeted this all the way back on August 28, 2012:
BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE IN THE WORLD... except it's too late because I already am that change.
You can thank me with 10s and 20s, sent to my home, and I will accept them with all the grace of a man burning with the intensity of SN2012aw, which we all know is the newest-discovered supernova and one that is getting brighter, not dimmer, which is how mad I am at this obvious hoax that made it onto legitimate news sites (HuffPo is that now, right?)
Longtime reader(s?) of this blog will instantly realize why I am so mad and so sure that this is a hoax, but for you new reader(s?) let me bring you up to speed, by recalling the halcyon days of yore when I let a Twinkie sit out for 100 days and then ate it:
EVERY STEP of Twinkie Watch was documented by SCIENCE and then I ate it, so I proved then that Twinkies cannot spoil.
But now along comes some Internet Huckster, trying to sell a molded Twinkie (he claims this
is a real picture of it) and frankly SCIENCE will not stand for this, and as the living embodiment of SCIENCE, it is up to me to debunk this horrible person's attempt to grab fame by disproving a law of nature.
I will begin by using Dan Savage's rules for detecting fake letters on his advice column, and I will (SPOILER ALERT! PUN INTENDED!) end by announcing a new SCIENCE!
First, the obviously fake explanation. This is verbatim from Fraudster's Ebay sales site:
Up for sale today is one (1) semiunwrapped authentic Hostess Twinkie, rotten as hell.
I've never seen one, and neither have you! I really did believe that these things and cockroaches would be the only thing to survive a nuclear war, but I was wrong.
Easiest way to do this is to explain my story. I have impulse control issues, and one of them concerns (concerned) Twinkies. To put it bluntly, I love them. Like a dog, I eat them (ate) until I got sick.
So, my wife rarely buys a box for me because she knows what will happen.Dan Savage's rules begin with "the piling on of unnecessary details." As my old law school roommate used to say, it's the details that get a person to believe. Piling on unnecessary details shows a story to be a lie.
Well, last year she took pity on me one movie night, and brought home a box of the creamy goodness in addition to something out of redbox. We pop the corn, dim the lights, and I bust into my box. I inhale the first one, and crack open the second one while watching the movie. Something catches my attention out of the corner of my eye. Inches from my mouth, I actually stop to look at the golden wonder for a second. It is GREEN. Not yellow, green. I turn the lights on to make sure my eyes aren't playing a trick on me.
They aren't. That sumbitch is GREEN. With streaks. My mouth starts tingling. I don't feel so well.
So, I survived, but I wrapped the green twinkie in clingwrap, and then decided I'd write Hostess. Obviously, they wanted it but I said no. They sent me a few weeks later a letter saying hey, guess what. It's not kryptonite, and surprise, they do go bad. Then, they gave me two coupons for free boxes of twinkies.
It was suggested I toss the Twinkie, but I was fascinated. So, like a biology experiment, I've kept it in my completely environmentally controlled top of my refrigerator, where I occasionally check on it to see what it's gonna morph into.
Then, Hostess went tits up.
Maybe someone will start making them again, maybe not. You will never be able to get this Twinkie, from the original recipe, original machinery, and original plant conditions again. Who knows what this thing will turn into? And, who knows why this thing went bad in the wrapper. Bad QA/QC at the end? Intentional infection of the supply by a striker??
I will NOT sell this to any country or nation state with an active biological weapons program, because I don't want them to weaponize whatever bug is capable of taking out a Twinkie. Nor do I want to release a Twinkie virus into the wild, ruining future supplies, so you have to promise to treat this thing responsibly.
Also, I guess I need to explain to some people, that although at one time this might have been considered food, IT IS NOT FOOD NOW. DO NOT EAT. DO NOT EAT. DO NOT EAT. It is a scientific and historical curiosity only!
I added some pics so that you can see how it originally looked.
Here, Fraudster, who got the attention he wanted, notes that he has a junk food problem, then really loads it on when he tells how he discovered this:
Well, last year
This was a year ago? Interesting. And hard to prove you wrong since you can always say "I don't remember the exact details." Why'd you wait a year to bring this up? A whole year to put it on eBay? YOU ARE A PATIENT MAN.
she took pity on me one movie night, and brought home a box of the creamy goodness in addition to something out of redbox.It's not important to the story to know where he rents movies. But it is important to a liar to add details.
We pop the corn,
Wait, what? Did your wife -- who is soooo controlling that you only get Twinkies when she allows it-- also approve the popcorn? Or was that for her?
dim the lights, and I bust into my box. I inhale the first one, and crack open the second one while watching the movie.So: They popped the corn, but took the unopened box of Twinkies -- the entire unopened box -- into whatever room they were going to watch the movie in. Controlling Wife did not have an issue about him intending, apparently, to eat the entire box while they watched the movie, and it's important to the story that the box not have been opened in the light.
Remember the lights were dimmed in the room. That's important, as is the fact that this is the second one.
Something catches my attention out of the corner of my eye. Inches from my mouth, I actually stop to look at the golden wonder for a second. It is GREEN. Not yellow, green. I turn the lights on to make sure my eyes aren't playing a trick on me.
BAM! It was a surprise! he was as surprised as you are! IF ONLY HE HAD OPENED THE PACKAGE IN THE LIGHT, but that would have been anticlimactic: "So I bought some Twinkies and one was rotten," his story would have been. NOT A GRABBER. He needs your attention: "I NEARLY ATE A TWINKIE OF DEATH!"
As for his eyes, they must have been playing a trick on you, but WHAT A TRICK! because in low light, only the rods of your eyes are active and while they are hypersensitive to light, they only see in black and white, so you did NOT see green or yellow.
Also, the corner of your eye would not be looking at a Twinkie directly in front of your face. And if it was, it's even less likely you'd see color because we only see black and white out of peripheral vision, as our brain blocks colors from the side.
It is strongly implied that Fraudster felt sick then -- so maybe he ATE a bad Twinkie? But he didn't notice anything wrong until he saw (?) the green -- so what are we to assume? That the Twinkie was so rotten it could activate his Spider-Sense... only after he saw it? SO: "I NEARLY ATE A TWINKIE OF DEATH AND MIGHT HAVE ACTUALLY EATEN ONE TOO WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING IT BECAUSE IT TOOK SO LONG FOR MY EYES TO ADJUST TO THE LIGHT AND MOLDY TWINKIES TASTE EXACTLY LIKE REAL TWINKIES OH IF ONLY I HAD OPENED THE BOX IN THE LIGHT WHILE POPPIN' THE CORN! WHY MUST I HAVE SUCH A JUNK FOOD PROBLEM?"
Here's something else: He ate them "until [he] got sick." Sick with what? Twinkie disease? Diabetes? Chronic fabricationitis? If he got so sick eating them, why'd Controlling Wife break down and get him some? Was she planning on cashing in his life insurance? Or do you mean that in the past you would just eat them until you got so full of them you'd barf, in which case, it was okay with your wife on this occasion that you take the entire box into the room to watch the movie? "Here you go, honey, and if you have to barf at least do not interrupt the part where Ryan Gosling takes his shirt off."
Ahem.
Second on Dan Savage's tips are needlessly elaborate stories: he wrote to Hostess, got a letter back, got a coupon for some free Twinkies (no photos of any of this, of course), the possibility of the Hostess strike being involved, the overly-broad warnings not to eat the spoiled food.
Finally, Dan Savage's third factor is the attention-seeking nature of the letter-writer. Note THOSE details: The guy has a problem with junk food, and a controlling wife! But he got attention from a massive corporation, and not only that, he has the only original spoiled Twinkie!
Maybe someone will start making them again, maybe not. You will never be able to get this Twinkie, from the original recipe, original machinery, and original plant conditions again.
The bid on the Twinkie went from 0 to $46 between when HuffPo wrote that story and when I looked at the site, and it appears that Fraudster has sold other items on the site and could no doubt use the attention.
In short, this is a scam. This Twinkie did not spoil. It did not arrive in the package green from mold. Not a single thing that Fraudster wrote in support of this sale is true. Unless maybe he's married. That might be true.
Well, I'm not taking this. I'm not putting up with some stupid scam artist getting publicity trying to claim a fake spoiled Twinkie is real. I am PUTTING MY FOOT DOWN, and GETTING A NEW TWINKIE.
THAT'S RIGHT. SCIENCE is back, and this time, it's serious. Or personal. Or whatever. I have directed Sweetie to get me a Twinkie today. And beginning tomorrow, that Twinkie is going to be exposed to the world forever, to see if it ever ever rots.
You don't mess with me, man. I'll take you down like yesterday's news. Or whatever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






